I just received a call from SMOE telling me they now "unexpectedly" have positions available in October and because I was part of the group that got cut the day before leaving back in August they want to offer it to me again.
Do i trust this?
furthermore, i've already accepted another job and they have my documents adn now i'm waiting for my visa number to get a new one. apparently though, SMOE never canceled my visa like i was told. i'm now just worried about getting double screwed and wondering what i should do...
And an interesting addition by another poster:
SMOE failed to cancel my visa as well. I'm not sure if it was the recruiter or the SMOE, but it wasn't until I had informed them that I had accepted another position that they offered another job.
As the posters there say, that a teacher left a contract so shortly after starting it signals trouble. Moreover, even though it's clear schools in Korea both public and private are capable of pulling crap like that, why would somebody jilted by SMOE trust it again? The original poster responds and says she'll go with the other job she has lined up:
thanks everybody. i pretty much decided on that plan but i suppose i needed to hear it from others who could relate as well.
i have been told many times (now that they need people) they feel "very badly" about what happened to me.
badly enough to pay for my ticket/wasted months of my life?
ah yes. that's right. no.
One of my Facebook friends said he received an email from an old recruiter he used a while ago, advertising among other things SMOE jobs for the spring. The friend emailed back asking about the screw-up this summer, though I don't know what response he received.
SMOE has yet to make any comment, aside from bringing out an unnamed spokeswoman for a Korea Times piece who essentially put the blame on unreliable foreign teachers:
An official from the education office said, "Many foreign teachers give up working with us at the last minute, perplexing schools that are supposed to have native English speakers, so we secure extra teaching hopefuls every year. For this semester, we selected enough applicants for a possible shortage as we recruit a large number of teachers."
She added some of the foreign teachers whose contracts were withdrawn had failed to submit necessary documents and skip mandatory orientation programs.
So rather than explaining what happened or offering an apology to the hundred who were jilted and the thousands who were disgusted, SMOE blames foreign teachers. Nice. But, I know when public schools start hiring for spring---EPIK accepts applications from October 1st, and other recruiters are accepting applications now---there will be plenty of applicants who will have never heard of this screw up.
8 comments:
an old saying my granny says 'the dog always turns back to its vomit' that was all i could think of when i read this post.
Hey, just bend over and take it, crackers. It starts to feel good after a while!
Brian wrote:
But, I know when public schools start hiring for spring---EPIK accepts applications from October 1st, and other recruiters are accepting applications now---there will be plenty of applicants who will have never heard of this screw up.
The "jilted" and those who sympathize with them should vote with their feet. Don't head that way.
And those bloggers concerned about this should write up a nice, detailed blog about this that would have a title like "Should I work for SMOE?" and would be sure to be on a Google search for "SMOE problems."
No idea if people are searching for 'SMOE problems' or not, but there's certainly lots of keywords that might come up - 'reputable', 'honest', or just SMOE. FWIW, a quick search for 'SMOE' reveals Footprints Recruiting's report about what happened, which may prompt people to examine a little further. 'SMOE problems' in Google offers the helpful 'Did you mean SOME problems?' and a few pages about various issues in the past.
Due diligence is required taking any job - and I'm glad to say that people are checking out more places than just eslcafe to make a decision about whether to come to Korea or not.
If I were one of those cut at the last minute, then offered another position because SMOE realized they fucked up in the end.... well, I'm not entirely sure I'd be able to write a polite version of "Jam it up your ass sideways, fucko!"
It is surprising to me that SMOE has the gall to actually ask them back. Despite their pre-approved status I can't imagine SMOE would want someone that pissed off on their staff.
Another reason why SMOE should have simply "wait-listed" the "extra" teachers from the very beginning, instead of telling them they're hired, then telling them they're not hired, then telling them they're hired again. In any large crop of new foreign teachers there's bound to be a few who can't hack it, for whatever reason, and leave early (especially in public schools, where foreign teachers can feel far more isolated than in a hagwon with several foreign co-workers). If SMOE had established a "wait-list", they could have avoided problems both for themselves and for the "extra" teachers.
Wait lists require forethought. SMOE has none.
Post a Comment