A morning of remembrance turned into one of flashbacks, fear and media missteps Friday when a Coast Guard exercise — unfolding near Pentagon ceremonies marking the Sept. 11, 2001, anniversary — was mistaken as an attack. The false reports of gunfire on the river briefly spooked the capital, sending FBI agents to the scene and grounding flights.
The episode left the Coast Guard promising to "take a good hard look at what we did here today" and military families sore that officials would simulate a confrontation on the Potomac River on a day of raw emotions and high security.
But the exercise, involving speeding boats and at least one helicopter, probably would have passed unnoticed except that two TV networks confused simulated chatter over a Coast Guard radio for actual events and reported that the Coast Guard had opened fire on a suspicious vessel near ceremonies attended by President Barack Obama.
. . .
On Twitter, the network reported: "Coast Guard confronts boat as Obama visits Pentagon, police scanner reports say shots fired."
After the Reuters news agency reported on what CNN was saying, Fox News followed suit, telling viewers: "Here is what we are learning. The U.S. Coast Guard ship of some type fired on what is considered a suspicious boat in the Potomac River."
Actually, the "shots fired" were simply a man on the radio saying "bang" three times.
The Coast Guard's chief of staff, John Currier, said participants in the exercise were given simulated instructions by radio to fire 10 rounds, and someone said "bang, bang, bang," — the routine signal of compliance in drills that don't involve live fire.
CNN then announced "breaking news":
Unaware that it was an exercise, CNN opened its reporting on the incident by saying at least one boat was intruding in a security zone on the river and the Coast Guard was chasing it. As the network showed pictures of the river, a banner read: "Breaking News: Coast Guard fires 10 rounds at boat on Potomac River."
"This is pretty incredible," said the anchor, Heidi Collins. CNN played audio from the scanner, with a man saying: "Stop your vessel. ... You will be fired on."
CNN has yet to apologize:
But CNN said "it would have been irresponsible not to report on what we were hearing and seeing."
No, shitheads, it was irresponsible to report on this without making calls and checking facts. Totally bush league.
5 comments:
Jamie Dupree was on Neal Boortz's program today, groaning over how one of the first rules of journalism is "Never broadcast what you hear on the police scanner without calling and checking."
The race to be first among competing 24-hour news channels is going to be the downfall of American society.
I thought the downfall of American society was going to be the creation of AI powerful enough to take over our nuclear arsenal coupled with our resolute deference to creationism.
Oh, Brian... it should have read,"Totally Bush league."
At least when Fox News distorts the truth, it's on purpose; CNN is inexcusably sloppy.
Mike wrote:
I thought the downfall of American society was going to be the creation of AI powerful enough to take over our nuclear arsenal coupled with our resolute deference to creationism.
Thast's what the 24-hour news channels want you to think!
Peter wrote:
At least when Fox News distorts the truth, it's on purpose; CNN is inexcusably sloppy.
Even the mainstream American media can be really bad sometimes. I was once misquoted in a major wire story completely out of context on an issue about which I was not interviewed, in a way that made it look like I had said something (and something somewhat offensive to boot) that was the opposite of my actual point of view.
Of course, I don't see the Korean media as much better, but I know a lot of not-so-good stuff about the Western media in Korea, so I tend to roll my eyes when I hear Americans talk up the virtues of the American press while skewering the Korean media.
Frankly, they both have huge swaths of suckiness.
Post a Comment