Thursday, March 19, 2009

Fox TV show playing into Korean stereotypes? No.

God, TV sucks. Here's the premise of a new TV show on Fox, Lie to Me, from Miller-McCune:
In the show, Tim Roth stars as Dr. Cal Lightman, who spent years in various far-off tribal places and has returned with a deep knowledge of facial expressions. He is able to detect lies by matching up emotions such as anger, fear and disgust to corresponding facial movements. He uses this skill to help various crime-fighting agencies. An interesting premise. (A show based on a savant truth teller who helps the police is not new. The fabulous British show Cracker has traversed this territory very well.)

Lightman's skill is based on the work of Paul Ekman, a well-known psychologist who has codified what he calls microfacial expressions. Ekman is renowned for his ability to read minute facial expressions and has written books with the Dalai Lama on emotional balance and advised anti-terrorist agencies on detection techniques. Ekman argues that facial expressions are universal. Culture, in other words, does not shape the physical manifestations of our emotions.

By "God, TV sucks" I mean the story for the show, not the stereotypes it is believed to portray. It just seems way out there, not like "Numb3rs" or "Fitness Corner," two shows I enjoy. Anyway, here's the writer's summary of a recent episode:
In a recent episode — "Love Always" (available online at Fox.com) — Lightman and his team are hired by the Secret Service to help uncover a possible assassination plot against a South Korean ambassador. Lightman's job is to detect anger on the face of one of the guests at the wedding of the ambassador's son. And here arises the problem, as articulated by an Asian-American Secret Service agent. Since most of the guests are Korean, detecting anger will be difficult. "Koreans don't like to show emotion," the agent says. "It is undignified." Lightman steps in and suggests that "nationality is irrelevant"; facial expressions are universal and involuntary.

In one quick exchange, the stereotype of the inscrutable Asian is presented and quickly thrown out the door. With the right expertise, the inscrutable Asian can be discovered and can finally be made scrutable.

Unfortunately, while the show undoes a major stereotype, it replaces it with a series of others: the stern Korean father, the secretly wayward son, the shameful silence over family secrets and the self-immolating political figure. In the final instance, the show returns us to a clear distinction between how they live and how we live. Lightman is able to make sense of the lies and the truth by the angle of a bow. The extent of a bow, the show suggests, tells you everything you need to know about this particular Korean family.

Oh the horror!



Sounds like that plotline is lifted right out of an episode guide to a Korean soap opera. I'm actually more bothered by the first stereotype---"Koreans don't like to show emotion"---than anything that follows. Koreans are the likely the most hot-tempered Asians you'll meet, if you'll excuse my stereotype. Clearly (1) the writer has no idea what he's talking about, (2) the TV show is stupid, and (3) confused hypenated-Americans would have a field day if they examined representations of foreigners on Asian TV.

3 comments:

John B said...

(1) The writer of the article actually did watch the show before he weighed in, and his comments were pretty accurate. The show contradicted the "inscrutable Oriental" stereotype, but at the same time presented the family drama in exoticized terms. The basic plot points were similar to histrionic Korean dramas, but they were given a heavy "Oriental" flavor clearly separate from "Western" family drama.

(2) The show is not nearly as stupid as it sounds. It seems to be based more on exploring the human relationships that underlie crimes, rather than the simple "whodunnit" of the other crime drama knockoffs.

Besides, a couple years ago there was a crime drama about a blind detective who solved crimes by smell. A major continuing point of drama in the first season was whether or not he should be allowed to carry a gun. That was pretty much the lowest point TV had.

(3) Korean TV does suck, but that's no excuse to allow US TV to suck, too.

Douglas said...

Well, maybe we should just stop expecting much from network television. By the time unholy trinity of greedy TV executives, spineless corporate advertisers and the right-wing culture warriors/left-wing do-gooders get finished with any thought provoking or edgy series...you end up with inane pablum. Fox does good work with animation, which for some reason is not taken as seriously as dramatic or comedic TV, but aside from that...download HBO, Showtime, AMC, etc. You'll be better off for it intellectually and entertainment wise.

yy said...

i'm a korean living in sydney and i saw this ep the other day.

whilst i was initally cringed at the concept, i actually thought it was done pretty well and i really enjoyed it.

here's my ebay rating of the ep: will watch again A+++++