
A screencap of a screencap, from a 미디어오늘 article.
The Korea Times has two pieces in the paper addressing the recent cartoon controversy. One is a letter from the Russian ambassador; an excerpt:
I am writing to you in regards to something posted on The Korea Times Web site on March 30 and April 1, 2010, which were caricatures concerning the inhumane terrorist attacks occurred in Moscow subway.
The appearance of such publications in the aftermath when our country is mourning over dozens of its citizens that have perished following a monstrous crime planned by terrorist forces, provoked feelings of bewilderment and indignity in the Russian community.
As well as most Russian citizens, we estimate the publishing of the caricatures in The Korea Times as an insult and outrage over the memory of the perished.
In our opinion, by doing such, The Korea Times practically connives with the international terrorists and those forces, who are interested in the destabilization of Russia and other regions of the world.
In particular, the most deplorable fact is that the caricatures concerning the Moscow tragedy appeared in the period commemorating the 20th anniversary of the establishment of diplomatic ties between the Russian Federation and the Republic of Korea
Such publications are hardly to promote the relations of the strategic partnership between our two states.
The website for the Russian Embassy in Seoul put out a press release on the 6th saying the cartoons "have caused indignation in Russia":
At a time when words of sympathy, grief and support come in from across the world, including from President of the Republic of Korea Lee Myung-bak, such a cynical move by the South Korean newspaper can only be regarded as an outrage upon the memory of the dead and as an insult to the feelings of the Russians who have lived through a terrible tragedy.
The Russian Ministry of Foreign Affairs has made an appropriate formal representation to the Japanese side over the publication in The Korea Times.
The Russian Embassy in Seoul demanded an official apology from the Korea Times editors.
The second is the Times regretting the response, mentioning the cartoons are syndicated out of Thailand; again, an excerpt:
It is regrettable if the cartoons aroused any negative feelings in Russians or any other readers.
We want to make it clear that the publication of the cartoons was not intended to insult or outrage Russians.
Our position is that any form of terrorism cannot be justified under any circumstances in the world.
We extend our deep condolences to the innocent victims of the tragic incident and their families and express our deep regret for any distress that has been caused by the publication of the cartoons.
We hope that Korea will deepen its friendship with Russia on the occasion of their 20th anniversary of diplomatic normalization this year and we will also do make our utmost efforts for this goal.

There is a note atop the online Opinion page, "Regrets Over Cartoons," which says
The Korea Times carried two cartoons depicting the bomb attacks on the Moscow metero on page 9 of its March 31 and April 2 editions. The cartoons are part of a syndication service from a cartoonis..
and continues into the piece quoted above. It wouldn't be right to hold the Times accountable for creating the cartoons, or to think it's the only paper in the world that carried the cartoons. The Times is responsible, though, for publishing them, and for choosing to carry the cartoonist who so many foreign readers in Korea found objectionable.
In the first post on this topic earlier today we learned that two Russian English-language news sites were claiming that editors were fired over the cartoons. In the second we read an article in the Korea Times on April 1st about the reshuffling with no mention of the cartoons, with blogger Monster Island exchanging emails with the cartoonist in question. For what it's worth, the cartoonist says nobody was fired.
I guess it will be interesting to see how this plays out, and a shame if several years of really shitty cartoons everybody hates becomes a free-speech issue and not a quality one. I'd hate to see any rallying around these cartoons, ones that have over the past couple years pissed off pretty much every English-language blogger in the country, if that counts for anything. It's probably appropriate that the paper has been unresponsive to the complaints of expats living in Korea and only commented on the cartoons after some Russian netizens got involved, potentially damaging Korea's reputation overseas.
10 comments:
What a heartfelt apology from the Korea Times... I wonder if they plagiarised that, too, from another newspaper.
Is the crying bear editorial cartoon any different from the crying eagle artwork that was popular after 9/11?
http://patriotic.jimrlong.com/911/911.bmp
It's a cartoon but then Koreans represent almost everything, including their police force, with a cutesy cartoon. Isn't the bear expressing the grief and horror of the russian people and the subway car helps illustrate what happened? How was that a "cynical move" according to Russian embassy?
The Russia embassy letter and the pravda articles still seem to fail to indicate the offense, other than "caricatures" are in poor taste.
Again, let's look at some editorial cartooning re 9/11.
http://www.andersonfreepress.net/files/cartoons/A8658A6E-D02E-49E6-A72C-D797A46D7909.gif
http://www.wadias.in/site/arzan/blog/LK0630g.gif
http://www.cagle.com/working/060519/ramirez.jpg
http://reason.com/assets/mc/_ATTIC/Image/091006_borgman_600x392.jpg
I sure don't mind the KT being made to grovel, of course.
not fired?
You state that they are not fired.
And your only evidence is Anti-Korea troll Kushibo's blog.(heavily questionable source)
I think that article is made up story.
1. Unproven source. Questionable source
e-mail? name? what?
2. Blogger is heavily Anti-Korea troll
3. I don't think Korean english skills well like that.
4. Do you really think Korean cartoonist understand english, fluent english, and the is a really kind like that?
Kushibo is an anti-Korea troll? Oing? I thought the party line was he was a simpering Korean apologist? Look, WE can make fun of Kushibo because he's OUR Kushibo, but when you start making fun of Kushibo, you cross the line buddy. Cross it big time. *chest thump*
Puffin Watch, people see what they want to see. Many English teachers see me as anti-NSET, or Korea-apologist, but many native Koreans see me as Japan-apologist or anti-Korean.
That's what happens when you try to present more than one side of the story, especially when people are so certain that their side of the story is not just right but righteous.
I've written about plenty of things that piss off both sides. I've had threats of physical violence and multiple attempts to get me fired, and they have been perpetrated about evenly by KoKos, White folks that include NSETs, and one particularly rabid kyopo.
I've even been accused of creating the death threat on Greg and of engineering the smear campaign that brought down Tony Hellmann.
Is there nothing Kushibo can't do? :)
[Seriously, though, I had nothing to do with either of those things, and both of those are very grave matters.]
k, shut the fuck up.
kushibo, all due respect, I didn't realize people cared enough about you to tie your name to scandals like that.
You're not the only one with online admirers, Brian. :)
I may have only one-third to one-half of your readership on any given day, but I've been online in Korea quite a while longer, so it shouldn't be a surprise that such things have happened. I have alluded to some of it before (and in the same link I subtly warned a certain Inchon-based Tokto blogger of the risk he was taking).
The Tony Hellmann accusation was first made at Korea Beat (can't find it now) and it was serious enough that it prompted me to email several people about it, including Tony Hellmann.
I guess I'm a convenient bogeyman in some circles. Plus there is a real-world nutjob who has decided to make it his mission to take me down, because I warned a couple people of his violent nature that got him kicked out of Korea, so there's that.
You're not the only one with online admirers, Brian. :)
The one I became personally acquainted with was a guy who kept removing Brian's name from the Seoul Podcast wiki page. He was listed under "notable guests". He'd remove it. I'd put it back. He'd remove it. I'd put it back. He then tried to complain to the mods that Brian wasn't notable and shouldn't be on that list (not mentioning any of the other names he left). The irony of course is Brian is the most notable on the list (regularly published in korean dead tree media, the subject of multiple korean dead tree media stories, etc.) In a fit of pique (but fully serious) I suggested to Brian I'd write a wiki page for him. I think he could pass notability no problem. That would cause his wiki stalker much grief if Brian was an approved topic of wikipedia.
To sum up ambassador's opinion - Don't mess with Russians, or pissed off Putin will invade Dokdo.
Post a Comment