Sunday, November 15, 2009

More on Busan shooting range fire; Korea Times reports death of Japanese tourists in Busan fire bad for tourism.

The Korea Times reports on the death of Japanese tourists in a Busan fire yesterday, under the headline "Shooting Gallery Fire Shows Lows of Tourism Initiative." The death of tourists seems to indeed run counter to the Korea Tourism Organization's aims.
A fire Saturday killed 10 people including eight Japanese tourists at an indoor shooting range in Busan, the nation's second largest city.

By tragic coincidence, on the same day, a gala ceremony was held in Seoul as a pre-celebration for the "Visit Korea Year" campaign for 2010 to 2012.

The two events display the conflict between high hopes and harsh reality. A high-powered cast including first lady Kim Yoon-ok was on hand to celebrate tourism here, but at the same time the most basic necessity of the industry ― safety ― was not even guaranteed. Some critics say that Korea needs to improve safety and other basic necessities rather than holding galas if it wants to draw 10 million tourists annually by 2012, the last year of the campaign.

The Korea Times closes with:
Japanese are one of the largest groups of foreign visitors. The Korea Tourism Organization expects the number of inbound Japanese travelers to reach three million by the end of the year, accounting for nearly 40 percent of the total visitors here.

To make Korea more attractive to foreigners, the government Friday unveiled a package of plans to draw 10 million visitors on an annual basis by 2012. Seoul Mayor Oh Se-hoon said in his opening speech: "With 75 percent of travelers visiting Seoul, how well Seoul does decides virtually all. I, as a head of Seoul, will do my best." The gala featured, among others, first lady Kim Yoon-ok, honorary chairwoman of the Visit Korea campaign; Culture, Sports and Tourism Minister Yu In-chon and Lee Byung-hun, the top actor starring in the current hit TV thriller, Iris. A number of boy bands and girl groups also performed at the event.

What's also bad for attracting foreign tourists is designing websites entirely in Korean, and using shitty English slogans like "Visit Korea Year: 2010-2012."

The story is all over the Korean news now, and Naver has a round-up of articles, though there's been little released in English thus far. The Korea Times has this excerpt,
Firefighters said the only exit was just 10 meters away from a room where seven people were found dead.

"It's unclear why the victims failed to find the way leading to the exit," a firefighter said at the scene. "Its structure is quite simple so it's not that difficult to find the exit."

while the Korea Herald writes:
Fire authorities had reportedly warned owners of the shooting range during a recent inspection of potential dangers because of the large amount of soundproof material at the facility that would produce heavy toxic fumes in case of fire.

And, as an update to the original post, I'll add Monday morning's Joongang Ilbo piece, which writes:
Japanese media were critical of the lax safety measures at the shooting range where the fire occurred. The Asahi Shimbun noted that opening an indoor shooting range in Korea requires strict standards for firearm safety and soundproofing, but that fire prevention tends to take a backseat.

The Yomiuri Shimbun reported that the burned-down Busan range had no windows and only two exits. It quoted an Osaka man who had visited the range in the past as saying, “It was such a closed-off place that it would have been difficult to escape if there had been a fire.”

Some of the television news reports I've watched have brought up other similar fires, including this SBS report which mentions a 2006 fire in a basement shooting range in Seoul in which seven died. Reading what's written in the Herald reminds me immediately of the fire at the Yeosu immigration detention center (1, 2, 3); a Korea Times article quoted by Gusts of Popular Feeling says
[Firefighters] failed to put out the fire early because each detention room was blocked with iron bars to prevent detainees from fleeing. It is believed that the high number of deaths was due in large part to the detention center's floors, a fireman said. The floors, which were said to have contained urethane, emitted toxic gases when on fire.

Fire safety is frightening in Korea, and you may have noticed a couple weeks ago that part of Chonnam National University's measures against swine flu involve chaining all but the front door in the language center shut.



I mentioned in a post eighteen month ago the practice of chaining university dormitory doors shut at night, to which Sonagi replied:
It was true while I was in Korea. I taught at two universities in Seoul, and both chain-locked the doors at night.

and Brian Dear wrote:
I was at Soonchunhyang University in 2002-2003 and they chained the emergency exits there too. Of course, being uncooperative with curfews and being trapped in a potential firebox, I picked the padlock and simply used a dot of glue to hold the lock together so it looked locked. Sometimes, you have to take your own safety in your hands. Buy your own smoke detectors, etc. That fire-exit locking business is a major, major tragedy waiting to happen.

and gordsellar wrote:
I suppose the real issue is that no dorms have burnt down. A few prostitutes dying because of being chained inside a brothel (was that 2002? 2003?) didn't catch people's attention so much, but a dorm full of students, that might actually wake people up. Sad.

Deaths of prostitutes, brown people and English teachers in fires hasn't raised many eyebrows, but now that a group of Japanese tourists have died, perhaps this will be sufficiently bad for Korea's international brand to prompt some change. The television coverage at least suggests people are paying attention.

25 comments:

kushibo said...

The article on the deaths being bad for tourism looks like it had been written about the tourism initiative before the fire had occurred, and was altered afterward by grafting it with a story on the fire.

Talking about safety as a key thing that hasn't been gotten right may be an important connection between the two, and a defensible connection to make, it's almost impossible to combine the two stories in a way that is sensitive and doesn't come across as cynical.

But then what do you do if you're a reporter? Do you just scrap the other story altogether? It was a news event, and talking about it without mentioning the fire would be even worse.

kwandongbrian said...

My university and a private high school I have worked at both locked their doors at night:
http://gangwon.blogspot.com/2008/08/fire-safety.html
---
and there's a Brian Dear as well? Including (ex?) ambassador Brian Dean Curran, there are three Brian Deans in South Korea. We ought to start our own group - you might be welcome, too, JeollaBrian, as you have at least the right initials.

3gyupsal said...

I worked at a university that would chain the doors closed on the dormatories to prevent students (and teachers) from comming and going after a 12:00 curfew. Students who wanted to stay out or leave had to sign a piece of paper (Ironic given that they were college students.)

It is also quite difficult to find fire alarms. I checked a few different stores, and they don't seem to exixt anywhere. Big corporate apparments already have fire systems, but with the case of one room buildings, it is a bit dicy.

I don't however, think that this will matter for tourism. If Korea wants tourists it should probably find a peaceful way to reunite with the north, and have something that people from other countries would want to see and do.

Brian said...

After Bill Kapoun died I looked around Jeollanam-do for fire alarms, and went to Home Plus, E-Mart, and Gwangju's Kumho World (the city's version of Techno Mart) and couldn't find a single one.

kushibo said...

I think fire alarms and CO2 detectors and what-not are available at various e-shops. I say I think because back in 2002 one of the people who worked for me looked into that and found them there. I ended up getting some from a friend who worked at Yongsan Garrison.

Puffin Watch said...

My school was divided in the middle with glass doors. The middle schoolers were on the other side. As was the only other exit in the event of fire. Of course they'd chain the doors during class time so the middle schoolers would not come over to the other side and make noise or something.

No one gave much thought to fire safety, of course. We were 8 floors up and no fire extinguisher had a needle on green. And of course all the fire flashlights had zero battery power as they were toys for the kids.

My thought was in the event of fire, I would probably be the first one to pick up a desk and hurl it through the locked glass doors.

(I used to carry bottled water with me, even in winter. People would ask "why do you need water in winter?" I would honestly say "to put out fires". Koreans would put out a soup can in the stairwell for their cigarette ashes. Other Koreans thought it was a little garbage can for their paper and plastic. Many times going down the stairs I would see fire in the can. I would then take my water bottle and put out the fire. What is it with Koreans and their inability to grasp fire and germ theory?)

kushibo said...

Puffin Watch wrote:
No one gave much thought to fire safety, of course. We were 8 floors up and no fire extinguisher had a needle on green. And of course all the fire flashlights had zero battery power as they were toys for the kids.

Did you bring this to the attention of anyone in a position to do something about it?

At the international dorms at Yonsei the fire exits on each floor were blocked, as were the doors that connected the south wing (where the guys lived) and the east wing (where the girls lived).

The guy who ran the place was adamant that was not going to change. He wanted to make sure people obeyed curfew, and he didn't want guys and girls sneaking into each other's rooms and having sex.

Indeed, there was a warning he gave every year about how among the hundreds of kyopo young adults in his charge last year there were several pregnancies, so we must follow these rules.

After being at Yonsei for a while, I realized this was all a b.s. story he gave every year as a justification for exerting his control and imposing his own strict religious values. "In Korea, men and women do not live in a co-ed environment; it would be scandalous." Ever heard of a 하숙집, Herr Director?

Anyway, I heard all these things back in the 1990s, but I could see the fire exits were still blocked a few years ago.

holterbarbour said...

Money quote from the KT article:

"It's unclear why the victims failed to find the way leading to the exit," a firefighter said at the scene. "Its structure is quite simple so it's not that difficult to find the exit."

Stupid ass Japanese fire victims.

Are there no building/fire codes? Certifications during construction? Periodic inspections? Fines?

I'm sure that this, like most other failings in Korea's safety regime, is mostly just a matter of lax enforcement.

Weaknesses in Korean architecture could be an entire post in itself-- those ridiculous glass doors that offer no insulation against winter heat loss (or summer air-conditioning loss), polished granite floors and stairs in a climate that is not immune to seasonal rains or heavy snows, uninsulated structures, drafty windows, etc.... if Korea has "green" dreams, they need to start with the architecture.

kushibo said...

hotelbarbour wrote:
Stupid ass Japanese fire victims.

It's always about Koreans-versus-foreigners, eh?

Never mind that three of the ten who were killed were South Korean.

(Other than that, I agree with the rest of your comment.)

Kelsey said...

When I taught at the JETI camp in Damyang, all the doors to the building locked at 10pm. This is a building meant only to ever house adults, not even college students, and it was a co-ed building. Why on earth they felt the need to have auto-locking curfew doors on a building housing adults was beyond me. We made jokes about throwing chairs through the windows at our orientation.

letsbook said...

Having worked in various office buildings in central Seoul for over 5 years now I have never once been involved in a fire safety test. No mock fire drills, nothing.

holterbarbour said...

Kushibo: I retract and rephrase:

"Stupid ass fire victims"

Koreans and Japanese are equally stupid when engulfed in flame in a soundproofed studio with no ventilation and, I presume, no adequate firefighting, lighting, or safety equipment. I would venture to say that people of all nationalities and races are equally stupid in that situation.

One more thing: Now that I think about it, given that handguns are illegal in Korea, you would think that in monitoring these shooting galleries, there would be some kind of safety standards that apply. Don't they need some special permit to operate? Might that approval process not require some inspection of the facilities (at the very least security to prevent the firearms from leaving the premises, documenting customers, etc.)? This was, after all, a small space in a structurally dubious building in what is most likely a crowded area of Busan...you'd think that a facility housing live ammunition in such circumstances would warrant some kind of fire-safety standards and enforcement.

It's not like some "massage parlor" operating under the radar... this is an ostensibly regulated industry that poses SERIOUS public safety risks if not monitored correctly...and if adequate safety measures were not in place, I blame lack of oversight as much as the fools running the place who turned it into a deathtrap.

kushibo said...

All I was getting at is that I don't think the statement in any way is an ethnicity-infused one. If anything, I think this is being taken care of seriously for the public eye because Japanese/foreigners were killed.

I'm not even sure if the guy's statement is necessarily one of blaming the victims either, depending on what was said in Korean and how it was said. I think one could easily look at "it's unclear why the victims failed to find the way leading to the exit" as one suggesting there may have been so obstacle or obstruction or the fire may have engulfed them very quickly.

I agree with your idea that the blame should not be falling on the victims (minus, that is, anyone who accidentally or deliberately started the fire) but on the owners of the buildings. So there was an exit ten meters away... that's a football field if there is fire between you and that exit. Too many older structures (and I'm defining older as anything built before the 1997 economic crisis) have only one fire exit — usually the main entrance. Someone or some ones screwed up in designing that building, approving that building, not demanding changes to that building, etc., if that's the case.

My own apartment block has four exits on each floor, but they are in a line, meaning that anyone from any apartment has only two directions for escape from their apartment: left out the front door or right out the front door. The elevator is immediately to the left when I go out, but the fire escape to the right is blocked on the floor below by the people in the end unit who have co-opted the space for storage. I didn't make myself too popular with them when I pointed it out to the association manager, who for some reason didn't realize the problem.

Okay, now I'm blabbering. This kind of crap makes me so angry.

Brian said...

letsbook, one of my schools held fire drills once a year. I took pictures the last time:

http://briandeutsch.blogspot.com/2008/11/fire-drill.html

Max Christian said...

When I visited the i-gem nursery school in 이촌동 a few months ago, the rear fire exit was in a storage room and was blocked off, and was in any case just a descending lifeline from an upper floor. The front exit opened onto a small hallway where large recycling bins were stored. It was difficult to see how many of the children could survive if someone dropped a cigarette into the paper recycling bin. Staff felt fire precautions were sufficient as children received instruction on how to walk down stairs during a fire.

At another nursery up the road, staff were keen to show us their rear fire exit was clear and shocked to hear this story, so it's not as if everyone is acting irresponsibly. But where is the enforcement?

kushibo said...

Max Christian wrote:
At another nursery up the road, staff were keen to show us their rear fire exit was clear and shocked to hear this story, so it's not as if everyone is acting irresponsibly. But where is the enforcement?

If there isn't a hotline to report these violations, there should be.

Brian, if you end up writing about this in a newspaper, can you please not specifically mention Yonsei.

Brian said...

I haven't decided if I'll do this for a Joongang Ilbo piece---I have others already prepared---or if I'll be asked to put something together for the Herald. I won't name names in the paper, and I don't think the paper would print them even if I did.

feld_dog said...

Where's the Korean newspaper headline:

"Korean building heroically burns itself down with Japanese inside"
?

kushibo said...

feld_dog wrote:
Where's the Korean newspaper headline:

"Korean building heroically burns itself down with Japanese inside"?


In at least one expat's head.

Dude, Pusan is about the most Japan-friendly part of Korea there is. I'd bet half the people under 30 would vote to join Fukuoka and become another country.

holterbarbour said...

"Korean building heroically burns itself down with Japanese inside"

I think @koreangov just gave himself away.

feld_dog said...

I lived in Busan for 5 years. And they rocked the Dok-do stuff there pretty hard, too. And the temples in Busan, like elsewhere in Korea, read "Built in ####, burned down by the Japanese in ####, rebuilt in ####, burned down again by the Japanese in ####. . ."
Anyway, above headline is just a dumb sick joke from my dark sick mind.

LadyE said...

I worked at Andong Science College in 2001 and when I questioned the practice of chaining the dormitory doors at night I was told that the practice was perfectly safe. There was someone in the dormitory who would unchain the doors if necessary. Of course, why should I have been concerned????? Students would never have panicked. (huhhuh)

LadyE said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
LadyE said...

The one fire drill I was ever involved in was at Kaggol Elementary School in Ansan. It was canceled because of rain, never to be heard about again.

Juicy said...

Wow, I just can't get over the fact that smoking was allowed on the range... I'm a recreation shooter (so I can be serious when I have to) and I've heard of no range, even outdoor ones, in the US that allows anything like that.

Smoking and bullets aren't a dangerous mix per se, but most if not all ranges collect shell casings and reload spent casings to sell. That's why most ranges have no steel casing rule, so they don't have to waste time separating steel from brass. Anyway, that means they have gun powders on the premise, and that and smoking definitely do not mix.